Conflict and ways of individualising mass images in early Kazakh prose

2021

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.52462/jlls.91
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Contemporary Kazakh prose is still experiencing the powerful influence of Auezov's artistic traditions. The paper reveals the importance of the early works of Mukhtar Auezov, in which the establishment of the main ideological, artistic and aesthetic qualities of Kazakh Soviet literature occurs at the initial stage with their subsequent deepening. The depth of insight into the inner spiritual world of a person, the scale in the sociohistorical reflection of reality, the skill in recreating the image of a person in prose – these signs of mature, artistic thinking were inherent in M. Auezov's early works. The scientific novelty of the paper is determined by the insufficient study of M. Auezov's early prose in these aspects. From the point of view of psychologism and the concept of person, the period of the 1930s in the works of M. Auezov differs significantly from the period of the 1920s. The portrayal of a new person actively building a socialist society, defending the homeland from class enemies, evolving morally and psychologically in the process of creating a new world, becomes the main task in Auezov's works in the 1930s. As the analysis of M. Auezov's works of the 1920s and 1930s reveals, the peculiarities of the development of his prose of these stages cannot be explained by the theory of evolutionary ascent from descriptiveness, psychologism to in-depth psychologism and mastery of psychological analysis.