Comparative Overview of Color Models for Content-Based Image Retrieval

2022

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/sist54437.2022.9945709
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Today CBIR (content-based image retrieval) in contrast to conventional TBIR (text-based image retrieval) has become a focusing research area in image processing due to numerous application possibilities. These applications vary from medical and security to business and SNS applications, to name a few. Color is the most widely used image characteristic since it is independent of image resolution or orientation. There is no single best color representation. The target application has a big role in determining which color model is best to use. To speed up the retrieval time and get good accuracy, one must understand which color model to employ. In this paper, we provide a critical review of existing color models, explain their attributes, analyze them from various perspectives and provide a context-aware comparative evaluation. We study when and why certain color models outperform others in certain applications under certain circumstances. Color spaces described in this paper are not only well-known e.g., RGB, CMYK, HSV, and Munsell, but also novice systems, like fuzzy color models, that can process higher color semantic levels.