Computer Vision-Based Pose Estimation of Tensegrity Robots Using Fiducial Markers

2019

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/sii.2019.8700452
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Tensegrity paradigm can allow creation of lightweight, robust, efficient and configurable robots. Modeling, design, control and sensing of tensegrity robots are challenging. Effective control of tensegrity robots requires accurate state information in real-time. In this work, we address the problem of six-degree-of-freedom pose estimation of tensegrity robots. Due to the unorthodox structure of the tensegrities and their wide range-of-motion, a computer vision-based technique is employed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work which uses computer vision to determine the internal state of a robot. Specifically, a hemispherical camera module was attached to the base of the robot pointing toward the top part of the robot. This camera was used to track the fiducial markers printed on a triangle-shaped plate on the upper part of the robot. Position and orientation of this plate in 3D-space was obtained by the use of ArUco markers, a fiducial marker system originally devised for augmented reality. The efficacy of our fiducial marker-based pose estimation framework was shown with extensive real-world experiments with a six-bar tensegrity prism robot. Specifically, the average position and orientation estimation errors for a 1.5 m tensegrity were 2.3 cm and 7.5 degrees, respectively.