Sound Symbolism in the Proto-Turkic Language

3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 2021

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.17576/3l-2021-2701-08
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Studies on the Turkic languages have shown that the difference between related terms concerning m ale and female , including back and front vowels, is a “ separate case ” (a special case). In this article, such a phenomenon was studied in more depth and detail, and for the first time, it was associated with sound symbolism. This work aims to show the role of sound symbolism in the classification of kinship terms related to man and woman in the P roto-Turkic language. To achieve this goal, we conducted experimental work with four babies . Our experiment was based on the bo u b a /kiki effect, which is used in modern linguistics. Besides, in the research work, an associative experiment was conducted with students studying at Karaganda University. Thirty-five students took part in the experiment. The study results showed that infants associated the image of a man, large objects with back vowels, and the image of a woman, small objects with front vowels. According to the results obtained using the associative method, the participants associated the front vowels with the stimulus “ female ” , and the back vowels were not associated with “ male ” . However, the participants showed an advantage in associating men with the uvu lar consonant [q] , which is only combined with back vowels. In the Turkic languages, we also found that terms associated with back ( thick ) vowels have meanings associated with males, and terms associated with front (thin) vowels have meanings associated with females. Keywords : s ound s ymbolism; Proto- Turkic language ; Turkic l anguages; Proto-language; m ale and f emale c ategories; v owels