Reed Switches Differential Protection of Conversion Facilities with the Second-harmonic Lockout

2021

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/elconrus51938.2021.9396639
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Advantages and disadvantages of traditional differential protections of conversion facilities and reed switch protections are discussed. A reed switch differential protection is suggested, the sensitivity of which is ensured by the second-harmonic lockout in the case of a magnetizing inrush of the conversion facility transformer. Another difference is that to obtain information about the current in the phases from the high voltage side of the transformer, windings of reed switches mounted near their current conductors are used. A technique for selecting trip set points of such protections is described and the sensitivity of its is estimated. Special attention is paid to the choice of parameters of reed switches mounted near the DC busbar and their windings. Behavior of the protection is considered under different operating modes of the conversion facility, and the field of its use is determined.