Rumor Stance Classification in Online Social Networks: The State-of-the-Art, Prospects, and Future Challenges

2022

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/access.2022.3216835
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The emergence of the Internet as a ubiquitous technology has facilitated the rapid evolution of social media as the leading virtual platform for communication, content sharing, and information dissemination. In spite of revolutionizing the way news is delivered to people, this technology has also brought along with itself inevitable demerits. One such drawback is the spread of rumors expedited by social media platforms, which may provoke doubt and fear. Therefore, it is essential to debunk rumors before their widespread use. Over the years, many studies have been conducted to develop effective rumor verification systems. One aspect of such studies focuses on rumor stance classification, which involves the task of utilizing user viewpoints regarding a rumorous post to better predict the veracity of a rumor. Relying on user stances in rumor verification has gained significant importance, for it has resulted in significant improvements in the model performance. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive literature review of rumor stance classification in complex online social networks (OSNs). In particular, we present a thorough description of these approaches and compare their performances. Moreover, we introduce multiple datasets available for this purpose and highlight their limitations. Finally, challenges and future directions are discussed to stimulate further relevant research efforts.