Entity Linking of Scientific Terms in Specialized Domains and Low-Resource Settings

Applied Sciences, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/app162110476
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The application of entity linking to the scientific literature in specialised domains is a challenging area, particularly in multilingual and low-resource settings where terminology exhibits severe knowledge base sparsity. The present study investigates scientific entity linking in Kazakh and Russian across four academic domains. The following subjects are covered: Information Technology, Linguistics, Medicine and Psychology. This paper introduces SCIMDIX-EL, an enriched benchmark that aligns domain-specific terms with Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons identifiers, explicitly handling unlinkable (NIL) entities. Using this benchmark, we evaluate three methodological paradigms: zero-shot autoregressive generation with mGENRE, a hybrid web-retrieval pipeline pairing the Yandex Search API with large language models (Qwen2.5-7B and Sherkala-Chat-8B), and lightweight dictionary baselines, combined with learned abstention thresholds. In this corpus, common-prefix matching achieves a Macro-F1 of 67.72 in Kazakh, statistically indistinguishable from thresholded mGENRE at 67.81, while in Russian, mGENRE exceeds lexical matching by 14.83 percentage points. These results are consistent with a larger lexical contribution in Kazakh and a larger role for semantic disambiguation in Russian, but the language portions also differ in NIL prevalence, dictionary coverage, and mention composition. Error analysis reveals that generative and web-retrieval systems fail in non-overlapping instances, indicating a measurable headroom of 12.64 to 14.04 percentage points for future candidate reranking approaches.