Achieving Sustainable Development Goals in Türkiye: Central Government Strategy Through a Cherry‐Picking Approach

İpek Didem Göçoğlu, Nilüfer Negiz

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1002/sd.71805
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Countries have differing priorities in the process of achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Examining how these priorities are reflected in national strategies facilitates the interpretation of future actions. The literature on SDGs achievement in Türkiye has largely been limited to municipalities, universities, and sectoral institutions. No study addresses the entire central administration, which is at the heart of national policy‐making. Aiming to address this gap, this study conducts a content analysis of the 2024–2028 strategic plans of 84 central administrations in Türkiye and evaluates the intended contribution, sustainability contexts, and performance measurement tools through a cherry‐picking approach. Across these forward‐looking plans, intended contribution is most prevalent for SDG 16 (98% of plans) and lowest for the ecological SDGs 6, 13, 14, and 15 (5%–29%), reflecting planned priorities rather than achieved outcomes. Central governments address sustainability as an institutional structure rather than a broad vision and measure success primarily through output‐level rather than outcome or impact indicators. The results indicate that the selective approach is also valid in the Turkish central government and that the biosphere aspect of sustainability is neglected. The study suggests making a roadmap for climate action mandatory in strategic plans, redesigning performance indicators based on impact, and establishing a supra‐institutional coordination mechanism.