Fast Spectral Simulation of One-Dimensional Nonlinear Fractional Waves in Attenuating Media

Computation, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/computation14100260
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Wave equations with Caputo fractional damping produce power-law attenuation, but their non-local memory term is costly, and stability proofs for nonlinear variants involve long, error-prone algebra. We discretise a one-dimensional wave equation with Caputo damping of order α ∈ (0,1) and a cubic nonlinearity by Legendre–Gauss–Lobatto collocation in space and a linearly implicit three-level L1 scheme in time. A sum-of-exponentials (SOE) approximation with a certified uniform relative accuracy reduces the memory cost from O(Nt2) to O(NeNt), with Ne growing logarithmically. Without relying on a sign of the discrete memory form, we prove, in exact arithmetic, a conditional stability estimate whose step-size restriction is independent of the polynomial degree and the time unit, and, under step-size and smallness conditions, an error bound of order τ2−α + N1−m + εSOE for smooth solutions. The algebraic core of both proofs, but not the approximation theory, is machine-checked in Lean 4. The strongly nonlinear computations violate the step-size condition; their stability is observed, not proved. The experiments confirm spectral accuracy in space and the temporal rate 2 − α for α = 0.5 and 0.7, and the memory evaluation becomes almost 60 times faster. For damping calibrated to a prescribed quality factor, the quality factor measured from synthetic seismograms agrees with the dispersion relation to within 0.5% between 5 and 20 Hz. An extension to Caputo’s constitutive model reproduces a nearly constant quality factor.