Using Wavelet Transform and Machine Learning to Predict Heart Fibrillation Disease on ECG

2021

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1109/sist50301.2021.9465990
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Processing ECG signals with high-frequency low-amplitude sections is a laborious task. Since this process is usually performed by specialists - doctors visually, the possibility of obtaining an incorrect interpretation of the ECG image is not ruled out. ECG is a method of studying the bioelectric activity of the heart. The research method is based on the graphical registration of the received bioelectric signals. In this connection, it became necessary to search for new methods for predicting signal propagation in various directions of science. The problems of extracting information from the electrophysiological signal that can not be obtained by visual analysis of the record, as well as the problems of automation of traditional algorithms of medical analysis are relevant in connection with the lack of research in this field. In this paper, we consider the approach of automatic electrocardiographic signals interpretation of cardiac valves based on the wavelet transform method. The model of the neural network of wavelet packets developed by us is used. The productivity of the constructed system was evaluated on more than 8000 samples. Test results showed that this system was effective when using wavelet transformation. The correct rate of classification was about 95.6 percent.