Abstract
Traditional Chinese urban planning constitutes one of the most comprehensive and enduring systems of spatial organization in world architectural history. Rooted in Confucian, Daoist, Buddhist and fengshui principles, it represents a unique synthesis of philosophical doctrines, cosmological models and practical methods of environmental adaptation. This article examines the structural foundations and evolutionary dynamics of traditional Chinese urbanism from the Zhou period to the late imperial era, focusing on the mechanisms that ensured the exceptional continuity of planning principles over more than two millennia. Drawing on classical treatises (Zhou li, Kao gong ji), archaeological evidence, historical reconstructions and contemporary scholarly analyses, the study identifies the key components of the traditional urban model, including axial planning, modular courtyard-based residential units (siheyuan), hierarchical spatial zoning, and the integration of natural elements such as mountains and water systems into the urban structure. Special attention is given to the interplay between ideological norms, cosmological symbolism, and ecological rationality, which shaped the functional and aesthetic logic of Chinese cities. Methodologically, the research employs a combination of historical-cultural analysis, comparative urban morphology and qualitative interpretation of textual and cartographic sources. This integrated approach allows the author to reconstruct the planning logic of major imperial capitals - Chang’an, Luoyang and Beijing - and to interpret them as material manifestations of the political and cosmological order of the empire. The findings demonstrate that the resilience of traditional Chinese urban planning resulted from the interaction of three persistent factors: a stable ideological core, a cosmological framework regulating spatial orientation, and environmentally adaptive resource-management practices. The article concludes that traditional Chinese planning principles retain significant relevance for contemporary urban design, particularly in the fields of sustainable development, landscape-sensitive planning and cultural heritage-based urban regeneration.