A Historical and Grammatical Comparison of Cases in Old Uyghur and Kazakh (Based on the Text of “Sekiz Yükmek Yaruk”)

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.32523/2616-6887-2026-156-3-189-196
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article presents a historical and grammatical comparison of the case systems of Old Uyghur and Kazakh. The study aims to identify the similarities and differences between the case systems of the two languages, reveal their language-specific features, and examine historical case forms that remain in active use in modern Kazakh. Foreign scholars specializing in Old Turkic languages note that the term “vibhakti,” one of the most frequently occurring grammatical terms in Old Uyghur, was used to denote the category of case. Previous studies also suggest that there are no substantial differences between the case systems of the two languages apart from certain variations in their case suffixes. The relevance of the study lies in the need to investigate the grammatical structure of Old Uyghur, which remains insufficiently explored in Kazakhstani scholarship, particularly the category of case, which attracted the attention of the Old Uyghurs themselves as early as the medieval period. Sentences extracted from “Sekiz Yükmek Yaruk,” one of the monuments of Old Uyghur writing, were used as the primary linguistic material. The study employed comparative, comparative-historical, classification, analytical, and translation methods. The findings provide a comparison of the case forms and their grammatical functions in Old Uyghur and Kazakh, explain the changes these forms underwent in the course of their historical development, and identify ancient case markers.