Shaping the concept of smart governance in regional public administration: institutional mechanisms, digital maturity, and citizen-centricity

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3389/fpos.2026.1950322
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Introduction Smart Governance in regional public administration extends beyond service digitalization and depends on digital readiness, citizen-centricity, managerial analytics, AI-automation integration, interagency coordination, and adaptive policy capacity. This study examines these dimensions in Kazakhstan as an emerging digital state characterized by advanced service-platform development and uneven regional administrative capacity. Methods A mixed-methods design was applied to the 2021–2025 period, combining conceptual analysis, review of regulatory and strategic documents, official regional statistics, indicator normalization, descriptive analysis, index construction, and directed qualitative content analysis of digital platforms and administrative practices. Comparable quantitative indicators were assessed across regions, while qualitative evidence was selected through criterion-based purposive sampling. The Smart Governance Index was partially operationalized because complete comparable regional data were unavailable for all dimensions. Results Kazakhstan has established a strong digital and service-platform foundation, but regional Smart Governance remains uneven. In 2024, the difference between the highest and lowest regional digital literacy levels reached 14.31 percentage points. Public satisfaction with government services increased from 75.1% to 92.0%, while eOtinish recorded more than 5 million requests in 2025. However, the ratio of eOtinish requests to the cumulative volume of eGov and eGov Mobile services was approximately 0.97%, indicating that most digital interaction remains transactional rather than analytically integrated into adaptive governance. Discussion The findings demonstrate that advanced digital service provision does not by itself constitute mature Smart Governance. Regional maturity depends on connecting digital infrastructure and citizen interaction with managerial analytics, institutional coordination, human-resource capacity, and feedback-based policy adaptation. The proposed framework therefore distinguishes service-platform maturity from managerial, analytical, and AI-automation maturity and offers a transferable assessment logic rather than a fixed regional ranking.