International housing finance projects and mortgage-market development in Central Asia with implications for housing affordability

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.21511/imfi.23(4).2026.06
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Type of the article: Research ArticleAbstractHousing affordability and mortgage-market development remain important challenges in Central Asia, where long-term housing finance is constrained by differences in financial-system development, borrowing costs, household incomes, and institutional capacity. This study examines the relationship between international housing-finance interventions and mortgage-market development in Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and the Kyrgyz Republic over 2020–2025. Using 18 country-year observations, the analysis combines the Mortgage-to-GDP ratio and outstanding mortgage portfolios with two indicators of international financial activity: IFI Finance and IFI Projects. Real interest rates, inflation, and real GDP growth are included as macro-financial controls, while Price-to-Income and Mortgage Burden provide supplementary measures of housing affordability. The empirical analysis employs descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, pooled OLS regressions with lagged and contemporaneous IFI variables, diagnostic tests, and HC3 heteroskedasticity-consistent inference. The results do not provide stable evidence of a significant association between IFI-supported activity and Mortgage-to-GDP. Lagged IFI Projects are significant only in one specification and lose significance under HC3 estimation, while neither contemporaneous IFI variable is significant. In contrast, real interest rates show more consistent positive associations with mortgage-market depth, while the relationship with real GDP growth requires caution because GDP is the denominator of the dependent variable. Mortgage Burden is associated with Mortgage-to-GDP, whereas evidence for Price-to-Income is weaker. The findings indicate that international housing-finance interventions should be interpreted alongside domestic macro-financial and institutional conditions rather than as independent determinants of mortgage-market development.