How to write (and review) a Genome Report

Genome Biology and Evolution, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1093/gbe/evag258
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

As eukaryotic genomes continue to be sequenced, assembled, and annotated at decreasing cost and increasing rate, it is important that basic notification of the availability of these genomes, along with essential information about them, be made available to the community. One way of doing this is through publication of a "genome report", a short article format that several journals have established. Here, we provide a brief guide to the genome report and its main components, with recommendations for authors, reviewers, and publishers of such reports.