Small airways disease in bronchial asthma and the role of extrafine inhaled formulations in clinical practice. Resolution of the Expert Council

Terapevticheskii arkhiv, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.26442/00403660.2026.09.203852
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Small airways disease (SAD) in bronchial asthma (BA) has been characterized in detail, yet it is rarely assessed in routine care and is not reflected in current stepwise treatment algorithms. In the ATLANTIS (Assessment of Small Airways Involvement in Asthma) study, signs of SAD were detectable in 91% of patients with BA, and an oscillometry-based composite score predicted asthma control and exacerbation risk independently of forced expiratory volume in 1 second. The aim of publishing the resolution of the Expert Council was to summarize the evidence on the clinical relevance of SAD, to define the diagnostic methods available in Russian health care, and to clarify the place of extrafine inhaled formulations within the treatment algorithm. SAD should be regarded as a treatable trait of asthma and assessed routinely in patients who do not achieve control. Impulse oscillometry with assessment of R5–R20 (resistance at 5 Hz – 20 Hz), area of reactance (AX) and X5 (reactance at 5 Hz) was endorsed as the method of choice; where IOS is unavailable, FEF25–75 may be used provided forced vital capacity is normal. Extrafine inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are associated with a higher likelihood of achieving control (odds ratio 1.34; 95% confidence interval 1.22–1.46) and a lower exacerbation rate (rate ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.73–0.97) at a mean prescribed ICS dose 170 μg/day lower. When control is not achieved on ICS/LABA (long-acting β2-agonist) or ICS/LABA/LAMA (long-acting muscarinic antagonist), switching to an extrafine formulation within the same treatment step should be considered before the ICS dose is increased.