FEW-SHOT IMAGE CLASSIFICATION: A SURVEY

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.32523/2306-6172-2026-14-3-4-24
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Few-shot image classification (FSIC) addresses image recognition when only a few labeled examples are available for each novel class. This survey reviews five major FSIC method families: meta-learning, transfer learning, data augmentation, attribute-based methods, and vision-language model adaptation. The $N$-way $K$-shot setting is defined, and standard training, theoretical foundations, benchmark datasets, and evaluation protocols are examined. Results for 5-way 1-shot and 5-shot classification are compared across four widely used benchmarks. The survey also examines self-supervised and semi-supervised learning, computational efficiency, and few-shot class-incremental learning. The analysis shows that representation quality strongly affects FSIC performance. Large pre-trained and vision-language models achieve high benchmark accuracy, but their performance is associated with substantially larger pre-training datasets. Direct comparisons across methods remain difficult because backbone capacity, pre-training data, and evaluation settings vary. Cross-domain generalization and practical deployment also remain challenging. Connections with PAC-Bayes theory, information theory, and causal representation learning are discussed. Finally, open research challenges are identified in robustness, long-tail recognition, fine-grained classification, multimodal learning, efficient adaptation, and standardized evaluation.