Experiencing nature through geotourism: a qualitative analysis of visitor experiences at the Güzelcehisar Lava Columns

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1108/whatt-06-2026-0223
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Purpose This study examines visitor experiences at the Güzelcehisar Lava Columns (GLC) through Hose's 3G model of modern geotourism, asking how visitors experience the site and how those experiences relate to geoconservation, geohistory and geo-interpretation. Design/methodology/approach A phenomenological orientation was adopted and data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 15 purposively selected participants recruited on site and through referral. Transcripts were coded independently by two authors and compared by a third, with the 3G model used as sensitizing concepts rather than a coding frame. Findings Four themes emerged: geological and aesthetic perception, the significance of natural and cultural heritage, visitor experiences and emotional impacts and infrastructure and accessibility. Aesthetic appeal was strong, but scarce interpretive provision constrained the geo-interpretation dimension, and two participants' reading of the formation as human-made points to an emerging authenticity-related tension. Infrastructure and accessibility emerged as a cross-cutting condition rather than a fourth dimension. Originality/value The study addresses the scarcity of empirical, visitor-level applications of a model predominantly used at site-assessment and planning level. It suggests that the three dimensions are experienced as interdependent rather than parallel, and that where interpretive provision was absent, aesthetic engagement did not extend into conservation-oriented understanding.