THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RELIGIOUS STRESS AND RADICALIZATION TRAJECTORIES: A DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.32523/3080-1281-2026-156-3-73-81
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

In this article, the authors provide a theoretical examination of the relationship between religious stress and radicalization trajectories based on K.I. Pargament's concept of negative religious coping. The study was carried out using a narrative review of the main literature published over the last decade. The analysis focused on three key mechanisms of negative religious coping: cognitive frustration, externalization (blaming the external environment), and manipulation by radical groups. These mechanisms were examined in connection with F. Moghaddam's "Staircase to Terrorism" model and A. Kruglanski's "Significance Quest" theory. The article also analyzes the emerging phenomenon of "digital religious stress," including the role of social media algorithms and the radicalization practices of online religious communities. Based on the analysis, the authors propose a conceptual model describing the path from negative religious coping to cognitive radicalization. The findings are addressed to religious studies scholars and researchers in the psychology of religion, and are of practical relevance for methodological work in the field of deradicalization. Since the proposed model is theoretical in nature, its empirical validation remains a task for future research.