Comparative analysis of international and national standards in the field of healthcare facilities design

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.32523/3136-3385-2026-156-3-85-96
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article is devoted to an analytical analysis of the key principles of designing medical and wellness facilities in accordance with current international standards and requirements (JCI - Joint Commission International, FGI - Facility Guidelines Institute, iHFG - International Health Facility Guidelines). The research examines the principles of forming architectural and planning solutions, which are key factors in creating a safe and highly efficient model of healthcare facilities. The article examines the importance of the influence of technological, sanitary-epidemiological and socio-economic aspects on the design of healthcare facilities. There is also a fundamental difference in the approaches to designing medical facilities. Within the framework of the national approach, the process of developing architectural and planning solutions proceeds from understanding healthcare facilities as a civil building with a strict list of requirements and regulations, while international standards consider the design process as an integrated approach taking into account high-tech processes, where planning decisions directly follow from medical activities, functionality and adaptability. The research results can be used both by design organizations for a more accurate understanding of the process of developing architectural and planning solutions, and by government agencies for making changes and additions to existing norms and rules due to their inconsistency with modern high-tech processes.