Exploring Readiness for Inclusive Education: Insights from Pre-service Teacher Education

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.46303/jcve.2026.48
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Inclusive education has become a central priority within global and national educational reform, yet the readiness of future teachers to enact inclusive practices remains a significant concern. This qualitative exploratory study examined how pre-service teachers at one university in Kazakhstan understood inclusive education and relational practices, how they perceived their preparedness and confidence to enact inclusive teaching, and what social, institutional, and pedagogical conditions they perceived as shaping their readiness. Data were collected from 53 pre-service teachers through 6 focus group discussions, 7 semi-structured individual interviews, and written reflections, and analyzed using thematic analysis. The analysis generated three overarching themes: developing understandings of inclusive education, uncertainty about preparedness to teach inclusively, and conditions that constrain and enable inclusive practice. Participants generally understood inclusion in terms of fairness, participation, belonging, and responsiveness to learner diversity, although narrower disability-focused understandings remained evident. A central finding was a gap between commitment to inclusive principles and confidence in translating them into classroom practice. Readiness was also perceived as shaped by practical experience, pedagogical modeling, resources, class size, institutional conditions, and social relationships. Interpreted through relational pedagogy, the findings suggest that readiness for inclusive teaching extends beyond knowledge and positive attitudes to encompass relational responsiveness, practical capacity, and the conditions within which teaching occurs. The study highlights the need for teacher education in Kazakhstan to integrate inclusive and relational pedagogies more systematically across coursework and practicum experiences.