Influence of a new complex biological fertilizer Yng-e Gyuntuk on the productivity and quality of melon crop and soil fertility

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.51886/1999-740x_2026_3_72
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article presents the scientific results on the effect of the biological fertilizer “Yng-e Gyuntuk” on soil fertility parameters in melon crops, phytosanitary condition, plant growth and development processes, crop productivity, and fruit quality. The study investigated and established the influence of the biological preparation on the phenological stages of development, biometric characteristics of melon plants, yield, and quality indicators of fruits. The results demonstrated that the application of the complex biopreparation enhances biomass accumulation in melon plants, improves growth processes and biochemical composition, and increases the content of macro- and micronutrients in the soil. The effect of the biological product on the phytosanitary condition of melon crops was also determined, and data on its biological and economic efficiency against a particularly harmful pest - the melon fly are presented. When plants were treated with the biological complex, the biological efficiency against the melon fly reached 87.42%, while soil application resulted in 88.13% efficiency. The biological fertilizer Yng-e Gyuntuk increased melon yield by 28.0-32.6% compared to the control.