HISTORICAL AND MODERN CRITERIA FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF AUTISM (ANALYTICAL LITERATURE REVIEW)

Actual Problems of Theoretical and Clinical Medicine, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.64854/2790-1289-2026-53-3-13
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Introduction. The increasing recorded prevalence of autism spectrum disorders among children highlights the importance of early identification and accurate diagnosis. Examining the evolution of autism concepts helps trace the development of clinical criteria and approaches to care. Objective. To analyze the development of autism concepts and diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorders, considering historical changes in classification and current approaches to diagnosis in children. Materials and methods. An analytical literature review was conducted using ScienceDirect, MEDLINE/PubMed, CyberLeninka, eLibrary, and Google Scholar. Publications on the history of autism research, clinical manifestations, and diagnosis were examined alongside World Health Organization documents and epidemiological data from the US Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network. Diagnostic approaches across editions of the International Classification of Diseases and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders were compared. Results. The reviewed sources describe the transition from early clinical accounts of autism to its recognition as an independent diagnostic category and the subsequent development of a spectrum approach. In DSM-5 and DSM-5-TR, diagnosis requires persistent deficits in social communication and interaction combined with restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior and fulfillment of additional diagnostic requirements. ICD-11 uses specifiers for intellectual development and functional language. Clinical heterogeneity and co-occurring conditions complicate differential diagnosis. Interpretation of increasing recorded prevalence requires consideration of differences in identification methods and study populations. Conclusions. Current diagnosis of autism spectrum disorders requires assessment of all diagnostic criteria, developmental history, intellectual and language functioning, and co-occurring conditions. The spectrum approach helps describe clinical heterogeneity while retaining the need for differential diagnosis. Early identification and individualized interdisciplinary care are important for children’s adaptation and social functioning.