A NEW FORM OF ORGANIZED CRIME: CHALLENGES OF COUNTERACTING SHADOW GENOMIC LABORATORIES SPREAD THROUGH VIRTUAL COMMUNICATION CHANNELS

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.47649/vau.26.v81.i2.36
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article examines the phenomenon of shadow genomic laboratories as an emerging form of organized crime developing at the intersection of biotechnology, digital communications, and criminal network practices. The relevance of the study is determined by the transformation of the criminal environment, in which illegal operations involving genetic information and biotechnological resources are increasingly disseminated through virtual communication channels, significantly complicating their detection, legal classification, and suppression. The aim of the study is to identify institutional and legal gaps in the system for countering shadow genomic laboratories and to develop an interdisciplinary model of state response to biodigital crime. The methodological framework comprises content analysis of scientific literature, comparative legal analysis of international practices, an online survey, and structural modeling. The findings demonstrate that in Kazakhstan, this emerging threat is characterized by potentially high levels of latency, insufficient interagency coordination, and regulatory uncertainty concerning new biodigital risks. A national counteraction model is proposed, incorporating six interconnected stages of institutional response: monitoring, detection, risk assessment, interagency coordination, legal suppression, and follow-up control. The model is supplemented by proposals to improve the regulatory framework, strengthen digital monitoring mechanisms, and enhance cooperation among government authorities, research institutions, and law enforcement agencies. The practical significance of the study lies in the potential application of the proposed approaches to developing a national system for preventing and suppressing emerging forms of organized crime associated with the illicit use of genomic and digital technologies.