ASSOCIATIONS OF THE CALCULATED MRI FAT INDEX WITH CLINICAL-METABOLIC AND INFLAMMATORY PARAMETERS IN ADULTS WITH MET-ABOLIC RISK FACTORS

Actual Problems of Theoretical and Clinical Medicine, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.64854/2790-1289-2026-53-3-01
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Pancreatic fat accumulation is associated with age, obesity, and metabolic abnormalities. The contributions of individual metabolic and inflammatory measures after mutual adjustment remain unclear. Objective: To assess associations of a calculated semiquantitative pancreatic MRI fat index with clinical, anthropometric, metabolic, and inflammatory measures in adults with met-abolic risk factors. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional analysis used prospectively collected data from 150 adults aged 30–60 years examined in Astana between 25 October 2025 and 30 April 2026. The MRI fat index was calculated from dual-echo chemical-shift images and was not equivalent to standardized MRI-PDFF. Analyses included Kruskal–Wallis tests, Spearman correlations, multivariable gamma regression, and sensitivity analyses. Multiple comparisons were adjusted using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. Results: The median index was 5.70 [2.60–9.83] %. The strongest positive correlations were with age (ρ=0.445), BMI (ρ=0.426), HbA1c (ρ=0.400), HOMA-IR (ρ=0.385), interleu-kin-6 (ρ=0.368), and insulin (ρ=0.354); HDL cholesterol was inversely correlated (ρ=−0.240). In the full gamma model, only age remained statistically significant, with a mean ratio of 1.510 per standard deviation (95 % CI 1.254–1.818; p<0.001). Associations with sex, BMI, and interleukin-6 reached statistical significance only in the additional linear model. Conclusion: In unadjusted analyses, the MRI fat index was associated with several an-thropometric, metabolic, and inflammatory measures. After mutual adjustment, the association with age was the most consistent. The semiquantitative nature of the index and the depend-ence of other associations on model choice limit the clinical interpretation of these findings