Meat-bone Paste as an Ingredient for Meat Batter, Effect on Physicochemical Properties and Amino Acid Composition

2017

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3923/pjn.2017.797.804
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Background and Objective: Effective use of meat by-products such as entrails and internal organs is of considerable interest to the meat industry, since meat by-product processing can improve the overall productivity and economic output of the meat industry. To determine the effect of meat-bone paste (MBP) on the physical-chemical properties and amino acid composition of meat batters. Materials and Methods: Five formulations were developed, control and four meat batters with different amounts of MBP, 10% (MBP-10), 20% (MBP-20), 30% (MBP-30) and 40% (MBP-40), respectively. The active acidity (pH) of the formulations was determined by potentiometry. Samples were analyzed for water binding capacity (WBC) by exudation of moisture onto filter paper following the application of pressure. The amino acid composition was determined by liquid chromatography. Results: Proximate analysis of meat batters showed significant differences in ash content in formulations with MBP, which increased from 0.81% (control) to 5.24% (MBP-40), whereas the protein and fat content steadily decreased with increasing MBP. The fat content decreased relative to the amount of MPB from 16.5% seen for control samples to 10.71% for MBP-40. The protein content also decreased relative to the amount of MBP, wherein MBP-40, MPB-10 and control samples had 16.26, 17.67 and 17.49% protein, respectively. Meanwhile, meat batters with higher amounts of MBP had higher pH and WBC values as well as significant (p<0.05) increases in the content of glycine, proline and oxyproline, although the total essential amino acid content was reduced with MBP addition relative to control samples. Conclusion: Replacing first grade beef with MBP in meat batter formulations does not significantly change the overall nutritive and biological value of meat batters and thus could represent an economical use for meat by-products.