A Typology of Frame-Based Models of Intellectual Concepts in Kazakh, Russian, and English Linguacultures

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.17507/tpls.1610.23
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The relevance of this study is driven by the growing interest of modern linguistics in the contrastive analysis of the intellectual conceptosphere and the need to identify universal and culture-specific mechanisms of conceptualizing thinking across different linguacultures. The aim of the study is to develop a typology of frame-based models of intellectual concepts in Kazakh, Russian, and English linguacultures on the basis of their cognitive-semantic and linguacultural comparison. The methodology combines frame analysis, a typological approach, and linguacultural analysis, drawing on a corpus of texts representing different genres and discourse types. The scientific novelty of the study lies in identifying and systematizing semantic domains of intellectual concepts as internal cognitive–semantic subsystems that form hierarchically organized frame-based models. The results establish the dominant types of conceptualization of the intellectual domain and identify universal and culture-specific elements of the frame structure of concepts across the three languages. The main conclusions confirm the productivity of frame-based and typological approaches for analyzing the intellectual conceptosphere and demonstrate their potential for intercultural comparison and further cognitive-linguistic research.