ASSESSMENT OF WILDFIRE DANGER IN KAZAKHSTAN USING THE FWI AND FFDI INDICES

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.54668/2789-6323-2026-123-3-79-96
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article presents the results of calculating fire danger indices for the territory of Kazakhstan for the period of July 20…31, 2025, based on meteorological data and satellite observations of active fires. It also presents an analysis of forecast meteorological data from the Global Forecast System model for the period April-September 2025; the calculations took into account key meteorological parameters: air temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and precipitation amount. Validation of the obtained results was carried out using thermal anomaly (hotspot) data recorded by MODIS and VIIRS satellite sensors. A comparative analysis was conducted for two widely used fire danger indices: the Australian Forest Fire Danger Index (FFDI) and the Canadian Fire Weather Index system (FWI). The results indicate that maximum fire danger levels were observed in July, driven by a combination of high temperatures (up to 30...36 °C), low relative humidity (down to 13...15 %), and precipitation deficit. Spatial analysis revealed elevated fire danger in the southern, southeastern, and central regions, whereas northern territories were characterized predominantly by low to moderate risk levels. The comparison of indices showed that the FWI system demonstrates greater sensitivity to the combined effects of meteorological factors, including fuel dryness accumulation and prolonged drought conditions, while the FFDI is more responsive to short-term extreme weather variations, particularly wind speed. Analysis across seven Koppen–Geiger climate zones confirmed a statistically significant (p < 0.001) agreement between the FWI and FFDI indices (r = 0.86…0.98) regardless of climate type. The results confirm the validity of the combined use of these indices to improve the accuracy of fire danger forecasting and support their integration into early warning systems for wildfires, taking into account regional climatic characteristics of Kazakhstan.