Developing the Methodological Competence of Future IT Engineers in the Republic of Kazakhstan Through Problem-Oriented Learning

Education Sciences, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/educsci16101617
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Kazakhstan’s transition toward Industry 4.0 and 5.0 increases demand for IT professionals capable of solving complex engineering problems. This study theoretically substantiated and empirically evaluated a didactic model for developing future IT engineers’ methodological competence through systemic problem-oriented learning. A quasi-experimental study involved 150 undergraduates from four Kazakhstani universities. In an integrated Smart Campus environment, students addressed authentic, industry-informed problems through an approach combining Challenge-Based Learning with the Four-Component Instructional Design model. Tasks included designing critical information infrastructure with provision for post-quantum cryptography and developing an intelligent energy-management system using fuzzy logic and the NSGA-III and MOEA/D algorithms. Performance on two engineering cases was independently evaluated using a 0–100 analytical rubric; scores were examined using the Shapiro–Wilk test, independent-samples Student’s t-tests, and Cohen’s d. The experimental group outperformed the control group in Case 1 (79.36 vs. 70.33; p = 0.003; d = 0.50) and Case 2 (80.61 vs. 71.12; p = 0.002; d = 0.53). Analysis of 45 reflective essays and 12 interviews indicated changes in methodological decision making, attitudes toward uncertainty, and perceived professional relevance. The findings support integrating authentic challenges with structured complex-learning design, while the Quadruple Helix provides an institutional framework connecting universities, industry, government, and society.