Belief, Religious Practice, and Religious Self-Description: A Comparative Analysis of World Values Survey Wave 7 Data From Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.55221/2693-2229.2857
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Although religiosity may appear straightforward to measure empirically, no single survey item captures it fully. This limitation is particularly evident in societies where belief in God is widespread: belief may not correspond to religious attendance, prayer frequency, or self- description as a religious person. Treating these differences as merely methodological would obscure important variation in how religiosity is expressed. A comparison of five empirical indicators of religiosity in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan. It examines how belief in God, the importance of God in life, religious attendance, prayer frequency, and religious self-description converge or diverge. The analysis uses World Values Survey Wave 7 data from 3,726 respondents. Descriptive statistics, Kruskal–Wallis tests, Dunn post-hoc comparisons, chi-square tests with Cramér’s V, and multinomial logistic regression were applied. The results show that the five indicators do not follow a uniform pattern. Although belief in God is high in all three countries, religious practice and religious self- description vary across them. The findings should not be generalized to Central Asia as a whole because the study covers only three post-Soviet national samples. Within this scope, the analysis shows that religiosity is multidimensional and cannot be represented adequately by a single indicator.