COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ENSEMBLE MACHINE LEARNING MODELS FOR CREDIT SCORING AND FRAUD DETECTION IN FINANCIAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.54596/2958-0048-2026-3-309-318
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This paper investigates the performance of ensemble machine learning algorithms - Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and XGBoost - for solving the dual-classification problem of credit scoring and fraud detection within financial decision support systems. The study utilizes an event-driven architecture for real-time data processing, evaluated on retail lending application data through cross-validation and hyperparameter optimization. Experimental results demonstrate that Random Forest and XGBoost achieve high predictive accuracy for credit scoring, while boosting models effectively handle fraud detection. Furthermore, cost-sensitive threshold calibration optimizes risk management, and feature importance analysis reveals that behavioral and data consistency indicators outweigh traditional credit scores. The findings offer a robust methodological and architectural contribution to real-time financial decision support systems, enhancing automated risk assessment and fraud mitigation in digital lending.