Hybrid multi-task deep learning framework for joint forecasting of solar and wind power

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.11591/eei.v15i5.12426
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study presents the adaptive three-expert ensemble (A3E), a reproducible framework for joint one-hour-ahead solar and wind power forecasting. A3E combines temporal, physically informed, and high-generation Extra Trees experts through a causal local-error gate and is evaluated under a strictly chronological, leakage-free protocol. After timestamp reconciliation and causal feature construction, the primary source yielded 8,700 model-ready observations: 5,775 for training, 1,463 for validation, 719 for internal testing, and 743 for a same-source December holdout. The primary scale-neutral comparison used Macro train-SD normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) on 672 common forecast origins. A3E achieved 0.1978, compared with 0.2314 for the official photovoltaic (PV)-Client 2026 comparator and 0.2340 for TimeMixer. However, validation-optimized static weights achieved 0.2017 on the complete 719-origin internal test, compared with 0.2025 for adaptive A3E; the difference was not statistically significant under dependence-aware analysis. On the independent CISO and ERCO systems, TimeMixer outperformed A3E, demonstrating source-dependent model rankings. Event evaluation used 98 CISO and 320 ERCO high-generation events. The results support the value of heterogeneous expert integration, but not a universal accuracy advantage of adaptive weighting.