TYPES OF NONVERBAL ACTIONS IN LANGUAGE AND THEIR RESEARCH IN FOREIGN AND KAZAKH LINGUISTICS

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.62724/202630204
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article discusses the types of non-verbal language techniques and their study in the works of foreign scientists and study in Kazakh linguistics. The fact that communicants continue to understand each other fluently, even with the help of paralanguage techniques used along with sound language in human communication, does not need proof today. Because the history of non-verbal techniques, backed up by verbal language, begins in different ways. And the need to study them is the result of the increased activity of the idea of human language cognition in linguistics. From this point of view, the main goal of the research is to develop a classification of paralinguistics, to provide services for prosodic, proxemic, and kinesic operations in communication. The study of various aspects of non-verbal elements, which are the main object of paralinguistic science, their scientific analysis by foreign scientists, and the definition of types have prompted the study in Kazakh linguistics. Analyzing the works of prominent representatives of Russian linguistics, it is reported on the early implementation of non-linguistic techniques, i.e. non-verbal. The article identified which techniques are non-verbal, and defined them. Since nonverbal linguistic means are auxiliary means of communication, it is proved that their auxiliary function is defined in the verbal text, the elements of nonverbal communication are verbally transmitted, paramals are similar to linguistic units, including words, are their own, singular.