Institutional research in higher education: Historical Context and Implications for Economic Development

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.32523/2789-4320-2026-3-183-199
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Purpose – this paper examines the historical development of institutional research (IR) practices and explores its relevance for strengthening data-driven quality management in Kazakhstani higher education. Methods - a conceptual framework combined with a systematic literature review, organizational models, and practices in IR and higher education analytics, with a focus on adapting these approaches to the Kazakhstan context. Findings – a bibliometric comparison of publications from the USA, Europe, England, and Central Asia shows substantial differences in scholarly attention to IR. The USA accounts for 4,750 publications (40.9% of the reviewed total), followed by Europe with 4,554 (39.2%), while England accounts for 18.9%. Central Asia contributes only 115 publications (1.0%), covering Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Uzbekistan. These results suggest that IR remains at an early stage of development in the region. More detailed normalization, such as publications per institution or researcher, is proposed for future research. Drawing on the U.S. “combo office” model and existing practices at Nazarbayev University and KIMEP, the paper proposes pillars for developing IR capacity in Kazakhstan. Conclusions – developing institutional research capacity can strengthen evidence-based decision-making and data-driven culture, support continuous quality improvement, and help universities respond more effectively to a rapidly changing labour market.