TGA-DSC QUANTIFICATION OF CALCITE WITH XRF CROSS-VALIDATION IN CENTRAL KAZAKHSTAN MANGANESE ORES

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.32014/2026.2518-1491.363
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) is used to estimate calcite content in ore feedstock through the mass loss in the CaCO₃ decarbonation window (700–850 °C). In manganese ores this interval overlaps with the MnO₂ → Mn₂O₃ → Mn₃O₄ reduction chain and silicate dehydroxylation, making unambiguous attribution of the mass loss to carbonate decomposition impossible. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) provides only the bulk Ca content without phase assignment. Reliable calcite quantification is required for the energy balance of pyrometallurgical processing and CO₂ emission estimates at the pre-sintering stage. A cross-validation protocol is proposed to test the carbonate hypothesis. Since CaCO₃ → CaO + CO₂ releases 43.97 wt.% CO₂, the calcite mass fraction from TGA equals the mass loss divided by 0.4397. An independent estimate from XRF uses the molar ratio M(CaCO₃)/M(Ca) = 2.4973. Agreement between the two estimates within the relative discrepancy δ ≤ 5 %, derived from propagated measurement uncertainties, confirms that the mass loss is attributable entirely to decarbonation. The protocol is tested on two contrasting ores from Central Kazakhstan: carbonate-bearing Bogach (positive control) and silicate-bearing Zhaksy (negative control). For Bogach the two estimates converge at 14.33 wt.% (TGA) and 13.58 wt.% (XRF), δ = +5.2 %, confirming a calcite origin. For Zhaksy δ = +70.5 %, clearly violating the hypothesis; two independent checks corroborate this conclusion: the integrated DSC heat effect of 537 J g⁻¹ is sixteen times higher than expected for the XRF-based calcite content, and the dTG–DSC minimum offset of +77 °C (versus +9 °C for Bogach) indicates that the two signals originate from different processes. The protocol uses TGA and XRF and identifies samples for which naive TGA-based calcite estimation would yield an overestimate, providing grounds for directing them to phase-resolved analysis (XRD Rietveld, TG–MS).