ARCHITECTURE OF FUNERARY BUILDINGS OF THE KIMEK KHAGANATE PEOPLE

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.47500/2026.v27.i3.08
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article examines the architectural features of burial structures of the Kimek Khaganate as an important source for understanding the historical and cultural processes of the Early Middle Ages across the Eurasian steppes. It analyses the principal types of above-ground funerary architecture, including square, rectangular, and oval stone fences, some forming elongated burial mounds, as well as rounded stone, stone-and-earth, and earthen mounds, stone and mud-brick grave constructions, and additional elements defining the sacred space of necropolises. Particular attention is given to structural features of fences, the techniques used in their construction, orientation, layout and use of various types of building stone. The study examines data from archaeological investigations of sites such as the Zevakinsky and Orlovsky, Jartas, Leontievsky, Kovalevka, Temir-Kanka II, Izmailovka, Belokamenka, Akchiy I–III, Karashat I–II, Sandykkala, Kogaly I, Ayan, Tuyetas, Kansar, and Menovnoye VI, XII. It is noted that the architectural features of the Kimek burial complexes reflect complex ethno-cultural interactions in the 9th-11th centuries and bear witness to the preservation and transformation of architectural and funerary traditions of the ancient Turkic population. These findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of Kimek funerary architecture, ritual practices, cultural continuity, regional diversity, and worldview.