A methodology for AI-supported cross-level professional collaboration in computer science education using the AI-Ustaz platform

Frontiers in Education, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3389/feduc.2026.1893468
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Introduction Contemporary educational environments require educators to participate in professional networks that extend across institutional levels. This study presents a methodology for AI-supported cross-level professional collaboration involving pre-service teachers, secondary-school teachers, and college instructors, with the AI-Ustaz platform serving as the shared technological environment. Methods The methodology comprised three sequential stages: theoretical–orientational, technological, and project–networked. A cluster quasi-experimental pretest–posttest design was implemented during the 2024–2025 academic year with 347 participants across nine educational institutions in Kazakhstan. Participants were allocated to an experimental group (n = 178) and a control group (n = 169). Cognitive, performative, and reflective components of networked-collaboration competence were assessed. Results Descriptive analyses indicated greater pretest-to-posttest improvements in the experimental group across the cognitive, performative, and reflective components. At posttest, the experimental group required approximately 61% less time to prepare instructional materials than the control group and received higher expert ratings for content quality. Discussion The findings suggest that AI-supported cross-level professional collaboration may provide a promising model for educational practice. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously because participants were nested within institutional clusters and cluster-adjusted analyses could not be performed..