Strategic Coordination of Investment Policy between Kazakhstan and China within International Transport Corridors

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.37394/23207.2026.23.129
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The expansion of transcontinental transport corridors, including the Belt and Road Initiative, the Middle Corridor and the Trans-Caspian route, has increased the importance of effective investment policy coordination across Eurasia. The strategic position of Kazakhstan between China and European markets makes coordination quality a key determinant of corridor efficiency and sustainability. This study examines investment cooperation between Kazakhstan and China in international transport corridors, focusing on institutional, financial, and regulatory coordination mechanisms. The analysis employs a mixed-method approach combining official statistical data, policy document coding, and the indicator-based Coordination Effectiveness Index (CEI). The CEI operationalizes coordination across four dimensions: (1) institutional coordination, (2) investment and financing structure, (3) regulatory and risk environment, and (4) corridor performance, using normalized indicators and equal weighting. Empirical results for the period 2013–2023 indicate that cumulative Kazakhstan–China transport infrastructure investment exceeds USD 20 billion, alongside a measurable shift from state-led financing toward diversified co-financing and public–private partnership models. The CEI scores indicate greater coordination in institutions and financing, whereas regulatory alignment and performance monitoring are less developed. Findings demonstrate that corridor effectiveness depends primarily on coordination quality and institutional alignment, rather than on investment scale alone. This emphasizes the need for improved regulatory harmonization and risk-sharing structures.