Comparative analysis of the current state of creative industries in central Asian countries

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.58319/26170493_2026_2_93
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article presents a comparative analysis of the current state of creative industries in Central Asian countries — Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan. The aim of the study is to assess the key parameters of the creative economy at the regional level and to identify common trends and differences across countries. The research employs a descriptive-comparative method based on data from UNCTAD, UNESCO, the World Bank, and national statistical agencies, as well as an analysis of digital activity using open-source data. The findings show that Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan hold leading positions in the region in terms of the creative economy's contribution to GDP, employment levels, and activity on digital platforms. Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan demonstrate dynamic growth in the small creative enterprise sector, particularly in crafts and design. Data on Turkmenistan are limited, but the economic significance of traditional culture and crafts remains high. It is established that the contribution of creative industries to GDP across all countries ranges from 2 to 7%, while the region's total creative goods and services exports in 2024 amounted to approximately USD 850 million. The article concludes with practical recommendations for developing regional cooperation, digital competencies, and intellectual property protection infrastructure.