Gold recovery from primary and secondary raw materials: leaching, matrix effects and selective separation

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.36547/ams.32.3.2318
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Gold ore grades are declining, refractory mineralization is increasing, and electronic scrap and copper anode slime have reached industrial volumes. For such feeds the rate-limiting stage is selective separation from a chemically loaded matrix, whereas dissolution chemistry is established. This review compares cyanide, thiosulfate, thiourea, thiocyanate, halide, glycine and enhanced-oxidation systems by transferability between primary and secondary feeds. Cyanidation remains the benchmark, but its margin narrows once copper consumption, encapsulation and detoxification costs are counted. Each alternative lifts one restriction and imposes others on reagent stability and selectivity. Progress depends on integrating dissolution, separation and effluent management for heterogeneous feeds.