Physicochemical, Techno-Functional, and Storage Properties of Chicken Skin-Based Protein–Fat Emulsions

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/pr14193109
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Chicken skin and related poultry by-products are rich in collagen and lipids but remain underutilized, creating opportunities for their conversion into value-added functional ingredients. This study developed chicken-skin-based protein–fat emulsions and evaluated the effect of changing the fat-to-hydrolysate ratio on their physicochemical, techno-functional, compositional, rheological, oxidative, and microbiological properties. Four formulations containing 13.5–15.0% chicken fat and 6.8–5.3% chicken skin protein hydrolysate were prepared, while chicken skin and water were maintained at 36.4 and 43.3%, respectively. Three independent production batches were prepared for each formulation. The emulsions showed similar pH (4.82–4.99) and water activity (0.979–0.996) (p > 0.05). Water-holding capacity decreased from 78.74% to 73.60%, whereas fat-holding capacity increased from 41.00% to 62.40% (p < 0.05). Variant 3 showed the highest emulsion stability (22%) and an emulsifying capacity of 56%, while Variant 4 had the highest apparent viscosity (577 mPa·s) but the lowest yield stress (2.011 Pa). The emulsions exhibited a collagen-rich amino acid profile, and oleic, palmitic, and linoleic acids predominated in the lipid fraction. During refrigerated storage, TBARS increased from 0.34–0.37 to 2.19–2.51 mg MDA/kg, while total viable counts reached 3.83–4.03 log CFU/g by day 14. Among the tested formulations, Variant 3 showed a favorable combination of stability and emulsifying and rheological properties. These results identify chicken-skin-based protein–fat emulsions as candidate functional ingredients for further evaluation in food formulations.