Sustainable development goal-driven MCDM for HRES configuration selection: Prioritizing hydrogen production from excess electricity via integrated objective and subjective weighting methods

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.157704
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study focuses on the selection of the best hybrid renewable energy system (HRES) configuration based on technical, economic, environmental, and sustainable development indices, considering how excess electricity (EE) is best utilized for hydrogen production, water desalination, grid sales, storage, or dumping. The integration of sustainable development goals (SDGs) into configuration selection and decision-making regarding EE utilization has not been considered. A primary residential load demand of 1000 kWh/day for a case study in Astana, Kazakhstan, is considered to be supplied through an HRES. Results show that the PV/WT/Gen/Bat configuration and the use of EE for hydrogen production, with an energy cost of 0.128 $/kWh and a renewable fraction (RF) of 90%, fulfill all considered aspects with the highest TOPSIS score, where weights are generated using DEMATEL-ANP, the Best Worst Method (BWM), and CRITIC. Sensitivity analyses of resource, technical, and economic parameters generalize the results for other conditions.