Towards AI-Driven Tool Wear Diagnostics through Thermal and Electrical Signal Fusion

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2026.08.398
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Reliable tool wear monitoring in CNC machining remains challenging due to nonlinear degradation dynamics, regime variability, and limited labelled data. Existing approaches—physics-based models, single-sensor signal analysis, and purely data-driven machine learning—each exhibit structural limitations in terms of adaptability, robustness, or interpretability. This paper introduces a conceptual hybrid thermo–electrical AI architecture that integrates multimodal signal fusion with physics-guided structural priors. New approach called FUSAID is fusion-based signal AI diagnostics. Tool degradation is modelled as a latent thermo–mechanical process manifested through coupled temperature and spindle current responses. The proposed framework embeds physics-constrained feature construction and regularized learning objectives within a multimodal representation learning pipeline to improve cross-regime generalization and prediction stability. Rather than proposing a proprietary algorithm, this study establishes a structured architectural foundation for physics-informed multimodal diagnostics in intelligent machining environments. Comparative analysis demonstrates that the hybrid paradigm bridges the gap between theoretical consistency and data-driven adaptability, offering improved robustness, interpretability, and generalization under variable cutting conditions.