Experimental Evaluation of Audio File Compression Efficiency Using Fractal and Fractal-Spectral Codecs

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2026.09.013
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This article presents the results of an experimental study evaluating the effectiveness of two approaches to digital audio file compression: fractal and fractal-spectral codecs. The primary objective is to compare compression ratio, reconstructed signal quality, and computational efficiency for each method on a standardized audio dataset covering diverse genres and durations. Objective and subjective quality metrics—including signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), compression ratio (CR), and perceptual audio quality assessment—are analyzed and compared. The results demonstrate that the fractal-spectral approach, which integrates frequency-domain analysis via wavelet decomposition with classical fractal modeling, achieves a higher compression ratio with comparable perceptual quality relative to the classical fractal codec. This renders the fractal-spectral method a promising technique for modern multimedia systems where maximum compression efficiency and acceptable audio restoration quality are simultaneously required.