Comparative Analysis of Regression Models for Predicting a Synthetic Corrosion Defect Severity Indicator in Pipelines

Satybaldina Dana Karimtaevna, Nurdaulet Teshebayev, Нурбол Шмитов, Aina Zakarina, Korlan Kulniyazova, Nurgul Kissikova

Applied Sciences, 2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/app16199462
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of regression models for predicting a synthetic corrosion defect severity (CR) indicator in pipeline systems. The investigated dataset contains 10,292 observations, eight input features, and a synthetic target variable. Fifteen models and configurations were compared: Dummy Regressor (Dummy), Linear Regression (LR), Ridge Regression (Ridge), Lasso Regression (Lasso), Elastic Net (EN), second- and third-degree polynomial regression (Poly2 and Poly3), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), Extra Trees Regressor (ETR), Gradient Boosting Regressor (GBR), Histogram-based Gradient Boosting Regressor (HGBR), AdaBoost Regressor (ABR), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and CatBoost Regressor (CBR). The data were split into an 80% development set and a prespecified 20% held-out internal test set. Model selection and hyperparameter tuning were performed without accessing the test set using repeated nested cross-validation, with five outer folds repeated five times and five inner folds. The lowest mean root mean square error (RMSE) in the outer cross-validation was achieved by second-degree polynomial regression, with an RMSE of 0.019557 and a standard deviation of 0.001796; the mean absolute error (MAE) was 0.003762, and the coefficient of determination (R2) was 0.721530. However, its advantage over SVR was not statistically significant after Holm correction (adjusted p = 0.0662). On the prespecified held-out internal test set, Poly2 achieved an RMSE of 0.021454, an MAE of 0.003967, and an R2 of 0.679304. In the highest CR decile, the error increased to an RMSE of 0.050622, the bias was −0.017468, and R2 decreased to −1.372106, indicating systematic underestimation of high CR values. Permutation importance analysis identified carbon dioxide (CO2) content, gas production rate, pressure, water production rate, basic sediment and water (BSW), and oil production rate as the most influential features. These findings are limited to a computational experiment conducted on synthetic data and require external validation using actual corrosion measurements.