Integrity-Constrained Laboratory Screening of EOR Methods for Heavy-Oil Carbonate Reservoirs

Ainur Niyazbayeva, Ismail Mohd Saaid

2026

Full text Open access: Gold Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.31643/2028/6445.34
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) screening is commonly initiated from reservoir and fluid properties, displacement mechanisms, and expected recovery potential. In technically complex offshore systems, however, a candidate method may be unsuitable for further development if the associated fluids and operating conditions intensify corrosion, inorganic scaling, organic deposition, emulsion persistence, phase instability, or near-wellbore damage. This study develops an integrity-constrained pre-pilot laboratory screening workflow for the integrated Field X-Field Y system. The workflow integrates brine chemistry and water-compatibility calculations, corrosion and inhibitor tests, wax-appearance-temperature (WAT) and viscosity data, emulsion stability, PVT recombination, and filtration compatibility. Untreated corrosion rates reached 11.586 mm/year at the electrical submersible pump outlet and 2.942 mm/year at the wellhead. Field X-Field Y formation-water mixing was compatible at 60 °C, whereas cooling to 30–50 °C increased predicted BaSO4-dominated precipitation, with 18.849 mg/L at 30 °C for the 75/25 mixture; the broader marine-water case reached 58.79 mg/L under the evaluated low-temperature/low-pressure condition. Field Y DST-1 was the most restrictive oil in the organic-deposition screen, with 10.6 wt.% paraffin and WAT evidence spanning 17.4–22.4 °C. Artificial emulsions retained up to 70% water for Field X DST-3 and 80% for Field Y DST-1. For the selected associated-gas analogue, a gas-oil ratio not above 90 m³/t at 18 MPa and 60.5 °C was used as the single-phase recombination boundary. The six-domain matrix was reformulated as an equal-weight ordinal qualification-burden index rather than a recovery-ranking tool; WAG had the highest burden (S=15; R=2.50), and this position remained unchanged under ±25% one-at-a-time criterion-weight perturbations. The framework therefore identifies operational-integrity constraints and the laboratory qualification required before direct displacement corefloods, compositional simulation, and pilot validation; it does not quantify incremental oil recovery.