Field evaluation of microbial antagonists for control of root rot and improvement of spring wheat productivity in Kazakhstan

2026

Full text Open access: Green Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1080/03235408.2026.2727564
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

This field study evaluated the effects of microbial seed treatments on field emergence, plant growth, yield components, and root rot development in spring wheat under the agro-climatic conditions of southeastern Kazakhstan. Two spring wheat cultivars, Diva and E-1, were used to assess microbial performance across locally adapted genetic backgrounds. Seeds were treated with selected strains of Bacillus, Lysinibacillus, and Trichoderma, as well as a Bacillus + Lysinibacillus consortium. Root rot incidence and severity were assessed at tillering, heading, and maturity. Microbial seed treatments significantly influenced field emergence and several yield-related traits. Bacillus mobilis E-bac1 produced the highest thousand-grain weight (43.2 g compared with 22.4 g in the untreated control). Lysinibacillus fusiformis D-bac4 showed the lowest numerical root rot incidence and severity (7.4% and 3.2%, respectively). However, these disease differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.696 and P = 0.670) and should therefore be considered seasonal trends rather than confirmed suppression. Root rot increased significantly during crop development and reached its highest level at maturity, with no significant differences between cultivars. Overall, the results suggest strain-specific effects, with some strains mainly improving productivity and others showing potential for disease reduction. Multi-year field trials are needed to confirm stable efficacy under natural pathogen pressure.