Radiation Resistance of Organic Solar Cells for Space Applications: Conventional vs. Inverted Device Architecture

2026

Closed access Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.1002/adfm.78561
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Understanding the radiation tolerance of charge‐transport layers is essential for the reliable operation of organic solar cells (OSCs) in space. Here, we compare the response of conventional and inverted PM6:Y6 OSCs to extreme 140 keV pulsed proton irradiation at a fluence of 10 12 protons cm −2 , with particular emphasis on transport‐layer‐dependent degradation. Although both architectures show similar initial power‐conversion efficiencies, the inverted devices retain substantially higher photovoltaic performance after irradiation than the conventional counterparts. Loss analysis reveals that irradiation increases non‐radiative V OC losses and series‐resistance‐related fill‐factor losses in both architectures, with markedly stronger degradation in conventional devices. X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy indicates irradiation‐induced modification of nitrogen chemical states in PDINN and defect‐related oxygen states in ZnO. Combined with the voltage‐impedance spectroscopy analysis, these results are consistent with significantly stronger radiation‐induced interfacial trap formation in the conventional architecture than in the inverted one. Post‐irradiation thermal annealing partially restores device performance, with much more effective recovery in inverted OSCs. Overall, the results show that transport‐layer/interfacial design plays a decisive role in radiation tolerance and identify inverted PM6:Y6 OSCs as the more promising architecture for ionizing radiation environments.