Of the city of Аlatau: tax autonomy and the unity of the legal space

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.46914/2959-4197-2026-1-3-62-74
Data confidence 70 medium
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

The article examines the special legal regime of the city of Alatau not merely as another instrument of regional development, but as a new form of territorially limited legal experiment within a unitary state. The study focuses on three interrelated issues: the creation of a special institutional environment for private investment, the introduction of functional elements of tax and budgetary autonomy, and the reconciliation of these features with the constitutional unity of the legal space of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The article argues that the Alatau regime cannot be reduced to the ordinary model of a special economic zone, since the Constitutional Law covers city governance, special regulatory acts of the administration, tax preferences, investment disputes, contractual models and experimental legal regimes. At the same time, such differentiation is not unlimited: the law expressly excludes citizens’ rights and freedoms, personal data, criminal law and several other protected areas from the scope of the special regime. The author shows that investment predictability, administrative flexibility and an infrastructural impulse must be balanced by legal safeguards: an open register of acts, fiscal assessment of tax preferences, periodic audit of experimental regimes and accessible mechanisms of legal protection.