Mechanisms for the settlement of international legal disputes over the use of transboundary water resource

2026

Full text Open access: Hybrid Metadata (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.46914/2959-4197-2026-1-3-300-310
Data confidence 85 high
How this score is calculated

It is built from checkable properties of the record itself: whether the article has a DOI, how many independent sources confirmed its data, whether the required fields are filled in, and how recent the latest confirmation is. Disagreement between sources and a missing identifier lower it. A value of 80 or above means the record was published without further checking; 60 to 79 means it is published at reduced confidence, with a manual check advisable. A record verified by an editor by hand is never pushed below 90 by a recalculation. This scores our data about the article, not the article itself.

Abstract

Effective use and protection of transboundary water resources is a priority area of international legal regulation due to the interdependence of environmental, economic and social interests of States. This issue is critical for Kazakhstan, given the formation of a significant part of the country’s water runoff on the territory of neighboring states. The purpose of the study is to systematize international legal mechanisms for the settlement of transboundary water disputes and to develop recommendations for their effective application in the water diplomacy of the Republic of Kazakhstan. The scientific and practical significance of the work is determined by the consideration of dispute resolution as an integrated system of prevention, coordination and institutional management. The methodological tools include formal-legal, comparative-legal, doctrinal, institutional and system-structural methods, which are used to conduct a comparative analysis of international conventions and water legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan. As a result, a multi-level settlement model has been substantiated, covering information exchange, prior notification, joint monitoring, negotiations, interstate commissions, mediation, fact-finding, as well as arbitration and judicial proceedings. The value of the research lies in the conceptual justification of the transition from the reactive settlement of water disputes to their prevention and sustainable institutional management.